MASSENA High-needs rural school districts could see their savings evaporate in three years, according to a report by the New York State Association of School Business Officials.
The September report says that if current trends in the use of unrestricted funds and restrictions on revenue continue, approximately 200 lower-wealth school districts in the state could lose all of their savings by 2015.
The revenue restrictions include the 2 percent property tax cap and state aid caps.
There is a way to get over the hump, but it would need to be addressed in Albany, according to Michael J. Borges, the associations executive director.
What is needed is significant mandate relief, Mr. Borges said during a telephone interview Tuesday.
Michael J. LeBire, the chairman of the Massena Central School Districts Finance Committee, told Board of Education members at the October meeting that if state aid remained at a projected 2 percent annual increase and if the district maintained its current programs, local property taxes would have to increase 101 percent over the next five years to bridge the budget gaps.
He also noted that if current levels were maintained, the districts reserve fund would run out before the 2015-16 school year and taxes could rise dramatically for district residents.
Canton Central School District is also on precarious financial footing, according to its auditor, who recently reported that the district is on course to run out of money next school year.
And in Morristown, with a dwindling fund balance and no new revenue streams expected, school officials are considering sending high school students to other districts next year if a regional high school fails to materialize.
Its a trend thats being seen throughout the state, according to the associations report.
The data suggested that lower-wealth school districts face the possibility of losing all of their unrestricted funds much sooner than average-wealth or higher-wealth School Districts, the report said. At that point, a choice between fiscal insolvency (a school district is unable to pay its bills) or educational insolvency (a school district can no longer provide a sound basic education) will be at hand. In the worst cases, a school district may face both kinds of insolvency.
Mr. Borges said the organization expected school districts to have financial difficulties because of a number of factors, but not as quickly as it could occur.
A lot of stuff is actually happening sooner than we projected. Our report was a best-case scenario. Even the best-case scenario is a pretty frightening prospect for school districts in the near term, he said.
District fund balances are depleting on a regular basis more quickly than we would like, the executive director said. When the cushion disappears, theyre operating on fumes, basically.
The problem, Mr. Borges said, is that while state officials have plans in place to deal with schools that are failing academically, there is nothing that addresses schools going broke.
Theres no such remediation plan to deal with fiscally failing schools. Even putting aside whats causing the problem to begin with, how are we going to deal with this? I think people are walking away from the problem or not recognizing the problem will occur, he said.
The only options currently available to districts, according to the report, are deficit financing, which allows them to borrow for ongoing operational expenses; advance or spin up of state aid from future years; bailout from extra state aid in the current year to meet operational needs; or a takeover of the school district by the state Education Department.
The report says the state can approach this impending fiscal calamity in three ways: prevent fiscal insolvency from happening in the first place by granting waivers to schools exempting them from regulations or laws that hamper their ability to stay solvent, react to each crisis as they develop on a case by case basis or develop a statewide approach with an early warning system and intervention process with correction action plan similar to SEDs academically failing schools approach.
While the subject of consolidation has been a hot topic in the state to save money, Mr. Borges said its difficult to actually do it.
Consolidations or mergers are very problematic. You have to get every school district involved to agree, he said.
Three school districts in Central New York recently put it up for vote, but that failed.
What you found recently in Central New York and the Mohawk Valley was that three school districts have a vote on a merger and one of the school districts voted it down. The whole plan failed, Mr. Borges said.
Regionalization is another hot topic and one that Mr. Borges said the association could support. But theres currently no legislation that allows it, and it wouldnt save an exorbitant amount of money.
Regional high schools save some money. Not a lot, but enough, he said. Regionalization kind of nibbles away at the edges.
It all boils down to mandate relief to cut back on costs, he said.
School education is labor intensive. Whenever you have something that is labor intensive the costs are going to be high. There are certain things the state had not done to address these costs. Theyve sort of fallen flat on mandate relief, Mr. Borges said.