We have another mass killing of young schoolchildren and their teachers along with the requisite calls for more strict gun control laws. Let’s examine what we know and determine what safeguards might have prevented this tragic event.

Most were killed with the assault rifle, and a ban on the sale of assault weapons might have prevented that. However, if the weapons had been kept in a gun safe, that also could have prevented the son from using them. An armed security guard in the school might have prevented this.

If we are to place responsibility for these events, we must question why the mother would keep these weapons and ammunition within easy reach of someone diagnosed with mental problems. Not only were the weapons within easy reach, the son was instructed in their use.

Common sense in restricting access to the weapons would have had more of an impact in preventing this tragedy than a weapons ban or further restricting legitimate gun ownership. The application for acquiring and carrying firearms does not measure common sense and tighter controls would not have prevented the son from using his mother’s weapons.

A total ban on all weapons would leave them in the hands of criminals and police. The police can’t be everywhere and are usually not around when the event is taking place.

Mark A. Johnson

Antwerp

Thousands of readers like you have made Northern New York Newspapers the number one ranked website* for local news and sports coverage in the north country.

You can continue on to this article in a few seconds, or you can visit one of our websites:

• Watertown Daily Times
• The Ogdensburg Journal
• Daily Courier-Observer