Northern New York Newspapers
NNY Business
NNY Living
Thu., Oct. 8
Serving the communities of Jefferson, St. Lawrence and Lewis counties, New York
In print daily. Online always.
Related Stories

Article 78 appeal filed by six Colton residents opposed to ATV law


COLTON — Six Colton residents are appealing a recent town board decision to approve a local law granting permission for all-terrain vehicle operation on certain roads in the town of Colton at a hearing scheduled for Nov. 8.

The appeal was filed Monday in state Supreme Court by Mary Jane Watson, Brian Parrotte, Jill Parrotte, James Ferris, Joann Ferris and Mary S. Rutley, all of whom live on either Route 56 and Cold Brook Drive.

The local law was adopted Aug. 14 during the town’s monthly board meeting.

The Article 78 appeal alleges the town board failed to satisfy the statutory standards for opening town roads to all-terrain vehicles, which are currently illegal to operate on town highways, it notes.

The appeal also charges the local law is arbitrary and capricious and violates the state constitution and suggests the town violated the state’s Environmental Quality Review Act when enacting the local law.

Town Supervisor Dennis B. Bulger said he was far from surprised by the filing.

“I was not surprised at all. It was fully expected from day one. Even from the public hearings, it was evident that there is a small group that would carry this decision into litigation,” Mr. Bulger said.

The law, as it stands, gives ATVs access to parts of Morgan Road, Windmill Road and Cold Brook Drive, equaling 2.95 miles. The route connects two trails that exist for off-road ATV traffic, according to town officials.

At the time of its adoption, town board members said the law would stimulate the local economy and be highly beneficial to the public. They also said it could attract more tourists.

Mr. Bulger said that despite the filing of Article 78 action, he and the board are confident with their defense.

“It’s a pretty set procedure. Copies are being made at the office as we speak. Copies will be sent to our attorney and to the county. Then we will get prepared to go for a hearing. It is set right now for Nov. 8, that’s the preliminary date for now,” he said. “We think our position is defensible.”

ATV traffic has long been a topic of discussion for the Colton town board. According to documentation of the group’s appeal, the board passed a local law on Feb. 11, 2004, opening 50 of 55 miles, or 90.9 percent, of town roads to ATV traffic. That law was annulled, however, in the case of Hutchins v. Town of Colton because “it was made in violation of lawful procedures, which imposes an obligation upon the municipality.”

A presentation, “Blazing Trails: New Life Through Community Links,” was held in May at Colton-Pierrepont Central School.

There it was announced that the St. Lawrence County Multi-Use Trail System would be opening soon in Colton, Pierrepont, Parishville and Hopkinton and would run throughout the county and the north country.

The local law did come with eight rules, conditions and restrictions attached to it. The criteria ranged from restrictions from using the ATVs between midnight and 6 a.m., to disallowing the operator to exceed 30 miles per hour and the prohibition of riding on the shoulder of the designated roads other than on the travel “roadway” unless the person is bringing the ATV to a stop or already has stopped.

These modifications were not enough for Ms. Ferris and Ms. Rutley.

“I just feel it’s a real safety hazard. Cold Brook Drive isn’t meant for all of this extra traffic,” Ms. Ferris said. “For me, it’s a safety concern for now and for the future. ATVs are already on private property. My husband will be 82 in February, and this will be more than an inconvenience for us.

“As you read through the violations, (the town board) didn’t do their homework. They never did a traffic survey. It’s not safe; it’s just not safe,” she said.

“We don’t have any enforcement as far as ATVs in Colton. They’re trespassing on other areas, and it’s been a problem for a long time. My husband is in a wheelchair now, and he would like to have more peace and quiet rather than commotion,” Ms. Rutley said. “Some of the tie-ups in Lewis County are similar to the ones here going on. As I see it, they have ignored the vehicle and traffic law. They are in violation of the state constitution as well.”

Back in August, Mr. Bulger addressed the possibility of an appeal or some other challenge coming the town board’s way.

“This time, the county is going through this whole process, looking at the environmental impact and all that’s required to get everything in position so that once we’re challenged, this time we should be in a position to defend it,” he said.

Commenting rules:
  1. Stick to the topic of the article/letter/editorial.
  2. When responding to issues raised by other commenters, do not engage in personal attacks or name-calling.
  3. Comments that include profanity/obscenities or are libelous in nature will be removed without warning.
Violators' commenting privileges may be revoked indefinitely. By commenting you agree to our full Terms of Use.
Syracuse Football Tickets Giveaway
Connect with Us
WDT News FeedsWDT on FacebookWDT on TwitterWDT on InstagramWDT for iOS: iPad, iPhone, and iPod touchWDT for Android
Showcase of Homes
Showcase of Homes